Previous allies of NJ'' s Christie fail to dismiss Bridgegate indictment

New Jersey Guv Chris Christie’s previous deputy chief of staff Bridget Anne Kelly stands outdoors Mercer County Lawbreaker Court in Trenton, New Jersey March 11, 2014.

Reuters/Mike Segar

<articleLocation” > A federal judge chose not to dismiss a criminal indictment against 2 former allies of New Jersey Republican politician Guv Chris Christie over their declared functions in the 2013 George Washington Bridge lane-closing scandal, called Bridgegate. In a decision revealed on Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Susan Wigenton, in Newark, New Jersey, declined arguments by William Baroni and Bridget Anne Kelly that the laws under which they were charged were too unclear which they had no reason to know some of their activities may have been prohibited. Kelly, a former Christie deputy chief of personnel, and Baroni, a former deputy executive director of the Port Authority of New york city and New Jersey, were accuseded of wire fraud, civil rights deprivation and conspiracy for supposedly organizing the September 2013 shutdown of bridge access lanes in Fort Lee, New Jersey. The closure resulted in several days of gridlock affecting the bridge, the world’s busiest, which covers the Hudson River to link New Jersey to Manhattan. Prosecutors stated it was meant to penalize Fort Lee’s Democratic mayor for not endorsing Christie’s effective reelection bid. In her 23-page decision, Wigenton said reasonable public authorities would understand that misdeed attributed to the defendants would violate drivers’ right to take a trip.

” Political repayment is not a significant government interest,” she composed. Wigenton also said it was for jurors to decide whether to hold the offenders criminally responsible for their alleged negotiations with former Port Authority executive David Wildstein, who pleaded guilty to conspiracy charges and is cooperating with prosecutors. Michael Baldassare and Michael Critchley, legal representatives who represent Baroni and Kelly respectively, did not right away respond to demands for comment.

A trial is scheduled for Sept. 12, court records reveal. Christie has actually not been charged and has rejected participation in misbehavior, however the scandal hurt his appeal within New Jersey and weighed on his unsuccessful 2016 presidential run.

Both accuseds are also looking for records from Christie’s cellphone through subpoenas to a law office that formerly produced a taxpayer-funded report absolving the governor of misbehavior. Critics of Christie have called that report biased. Separately, a federal appeals court in Philadelphia is weighing requests by media to openly release a list of unindicted co-conspirators. Oral arguments were heard on June 6. The case is U.S. v. Baroni et al, U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey, No. 15-cr-00193. (Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New york city; Modifying by Leslie Adler).

Read More

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *